Culture across the regions

Theme

How are cultural offers spread across the provinces? Where are most venues, libraries, cinemas or museums located? To what extent is culture visited? What is the distribution of cultural expenditure by government and province? This theme page shows provincial developments and is an invitation to explore figures and statistics on regional culture in the Dashboard.

Summary

The cultural landscape in the Netherlands varies greatly by province and municipality. Although the supply in absolute terms is concentrated in the Randstad, analyses show that other regions score relatively well in infrastructure, visits and investments per inhabitant. In terms of policy, there is growing attention for regional distribution, diversity and inclusiveness, with new provincial covenants and calls for a central cultural fund with regional departments. The Culture Monitor is expanding its data collection to municipal level to make cultural ecosystems more visible and to support policymaking at all levels with up-to-date and comparable information.

Introduction and significance of the theme

The role and significance of regional culture will be high on the agenda of policymakers and cultural institutions in 2024. Both the Raad voor Cultuur if the Interprovincial Consultation (IPO) and the Association of Dutch Municipalities (VNG) advocate a more inclusive and balanced cultural policy that takes into account regional differences and needs (IPO, 2024; VNG, 2024). In the advice Access to culture the Council calls for a strengthening of the cultural infrastructure in all regions, as well as investment in cultural education (Raad voor Cultuur 2024a). An important proposal within this discussion is the establishment of a single national cultural fund with separate departments per province and the Caribbean Netherlands, in order to better do justice to regional cultural initiatives. Although OCW has not yet given a substantive response to the proposed course towards a single national fund in March 2025, the Raad voor Cultuur that a new step has been taken with the current BIS period: 46 percent of the approved applications come from cultural institutions outside the Randstad (2024b and Nos Nieuws 2024).

In January 2025, in addition, various covenants by provinces, municipalities, 19 cultural regions and OCW signed for 2025-2028, in which regional cooperation and financing of culture are laid down (Ministry of OCW 2025). For the first time, all 12 provinces are represented in this. The covenants aim to strengthen the cultural infrastructure in the regions through long-term financing and better cooperation between the various authorities. In doing so, the specific cultural characteristics of different regions are taken into account, such as the presence of a rich heritage or strong local communities.

Regional differences and diversity

When discussing accessibility in the cultural sector and recognition of culture, it is important to consider both regional distribution and urban culture. Attention for 'the Culture' – a collective term for diasporic and migrant cultures – is growing, but still requires broader institutional recognition (Bedaux 2023 and 2025). Cultural expressions such as music, fashion, film and design, which emerged from postcolonial migration and diasporic networks, are strongly concentrated in urban areas and migrant neighbourhoods. Research by Significant APE (2024) shows that 81 percent of cultural institutions consider it important to reflect the population in the city or region. However, the figures show that this is far from being achieved. In the large cities (G4), where relatively many people with a migration background live and work, the share of employees with a non-European migration background in subsidised cultural institutions is only 22 percent, while this is 37 percent in the total working population. Outside the G4 we see a slightly smaller, but still clear underrepresentation: 10 percent at subsidized institutions compared to 13 percent in the working population.

In regional cultural policy, the role of local communities is receiving increasing attention. environmental code emphasises the importance of citizen involvement by involving citizens and social organisations at an early stage in decision-making processes on projects that affect their living environment. At the request of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Platform Ontwerp NL investigated what the culture of the living environment is (Boomen et al. 2024). According to the researchers, culture includes not only buildings, objects and spatial structures, but also customs, traditions, stories and local history, connected to people's fundamental values ​​and beliefs. This broad concept of culture ties in with a development that has been emerging since the beginning of this century and that is explicitly supported in the Faro Convention, among other things. Culture is not only seen as artistic expression, but also as a means to strengthen social cohesion and identity at a regional level.

Monitoring initiatives and regional data

The need for regional cultural data is growing. In addition to existing provincial cultural monitors in, among others, Noord-Brabant, Zeeland, Zuid-Holland, Gelderland, Overijssel, Drenthe and Flevoland, more and more cities are developing their own measuring instruments. See the bottom of this page for a list of monitors per province. And industry associations are also collecting more data about the region. The Museum Figures show clear regional differences in museum visits and funding (Museana 2024). The Regional Cultural Monitor of the Boekmanstichting (2022) previously showed how cultural practices vary per province, but policymakers are asking for even more detailed data at the municipal level.

In 2024, an important step was taken by the possibility of mapping municipal data within the Culture Monitor. The pilot Value of Culture served as an initial exploration, and in May 2025 the Culture and Heritage Monitor Gelderland will follow. These provinces will have their own 'copy' of the national Culture Monitor, including a database. In collaboration with these provinces and provincial support institutions (POIs), we will strengthen the local knowledge base and the national Culture Monitor, which is becoming increasingly richer with local data and insights.

The theme page Culture in the regions is an invitation to explore the Dashboard and discover striking patterns at the regional level.

Overview of regional culture monitors

Below is an overview of the partial analyses per province by the Regional Culture Monitor and other available monitors. Is a monitor missing from this overview? Then we'd love to hear about it!

Drenthe

Friesland

Gelderland

Groningen

North-Brabant

Utrecht

Would you like to know more about the theme of Culture in the regions?

View more regional data in the Dashboard of the Culture Monitor. 

All publications that the Boekman Foundation itself produces on this theme can be found via the online dossier Culture across the regions.

More literature on the theme of Culture across the regions can also be found in the Knowledge baseof the Boekman Foundation.

Sources

Sources

Atlas Research and Boekman Foundation (2018) Regional Culture Index. Amsterdam: Atlas Research and Boekman Foundation.

Atlas Research and Boekman Foundation (2021) Culture Monitor Amsterdam Metropolitan Area (MRA). Amsterdam: Atlas Research and Boekman Foundation.

Berg, N. van den et al. (2022) Regional Culture Monitor. Amsterdam: Atlas Research and Boekman Foundation.

Bedaux, LL (2023) 'Create cultural policy that does justice to diversity in the Netherlands'. On: www.unesco.nl, November 16.

Blaker, N., Veldkamp, ​​J., Beijersbergen, A., Booij, HM and Niessen, K. (2023) Museum figures 2022. Amsterdam: Museum Foundation, Museum Association

Broers, B., B. van Dalen, H. Vinken, J. Harings, R. Brom and R. Smeets (2020) Value of culture: the state of the cultural sector in North Brabant 2020. Tilburg/Amsterdam: PON & Telos, Pyrrhula Research Consultants, Kunstloc Brabant and Boekmanstichting.

Broers, B., B. van Dalen, H. Vinken, R. Brom and M. Goedhart (2022) Zeeland Culture Monitor: baseline measurement. Tilburg/Amsterdam: PON & Telos, Pyrrhula Research Consultants and Boekmanstichting.

Brom, R. and H. Vinken (2020) Culture in Gelderland: a brief benchmark. Amsterdam/Tilburg: Boekmanstichting and Pyrrhula Research Consultants.

CBS (2020) Detail of cultural burdens for municipalities and provinces. The Hague/Heerlen: Central Bureau of Statistics.

CBS (2022) Detail of cultural burdens for municipalities and provinces. The Hague/Heerlen: Central Bureau of Statistics.

Interprovincial Consultation (2022) 'Provinces face challenges together in the cultural sector'. On: www.ipo.nl, December 15.

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2020) 2019 annual report. The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2022) 2021 annual report. The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.

Our News (2024). More subsidies for cultural institutions in the region. On: www.nos.nl, 3th of July.

RCE (2022)'Complete and relatively intact Roman sanctuary discovered in Gelderland'. On: www.cultureelerfgoed.nl, 20th of June.

Raad voor Cultuur (2024a) Access to culture. On the way to a new order in 2029. The Hague: Raad voor Cultuur.

Raad voor Cultuur (2024b) Council assessment outcome: space for newcomers and region. On: www.raadvoorcultuur.nl, 3th of July.

UNESCO (n.d.) Irreplaceable. The innovative power of the Culture. On: www.unesco.nl.

VNG (2024) 'System advice: Access to culture'. On: www.vng.nl, January 27.

Justification text and image

Graphics and design: Sonsbeek20→24 in Arnhem / Photography: Martijn Baudoin (via Unsplash).